top of page
Financial Report

WELL Intelligence

A site + portfolio risk view grounded in worker voice — ranked by severity, paired with next actions, updated with each improvement.

A Holistic View: Two Instruments, One Report

Worker Survey Findings:
Is the risk present now?

Self-Diagnostic Tool Findings:
Could the site find, prevent, and remediate the risk? 

Group 2.png
panel · Could the site find it_ (1).png

Two Data Sources to Together Provide the Evidence Needed for International Frameworks

WELL · Signs of forced labor.png

Every WELL Program Extension Report Maps to an International Framework Regulations are Based On

Worker Welfare

ILO Decent Work Agenda

Forced Labor + Responsible Recruitment

ILO Indicators of Forced Labour

Child Labor

ILO Conventions No. 138 / 182

Fundamental Rights at Work

ILO Fundamental Principles + Rights at Work

Workplace Safety

ILO Convention No. 155

Sexual Harassment

ILO Convention No. 190

Grievance Integrity

UNGP Principle 31

Fair Wages + Working Hours

ILO Conventions 1 / 95 / 131

Equity + Demographic Disparity

ESRS S2

Findings Always Ranked:
Not Every Finding Carries the Same Weight

WELL · Where risk concentrates.png
Salient items — where potential harm is severe or underreporting likely — are rated more severely at the same score.

Two failing indicators in a documented pairing, like excessive hours against safety, are rated more severely than either alone.​

UNGP Pillar 2 Evidenced
The record of where the buyer stands on due diligence

The evidence buyer need for external reporting
WELL · Record of the process (mockup).png
Report
WELL ActionPlans.png

Always Paired with Actions for both the Site + the Buyer

bottom of page